The Scientific Proof of Survival After Death.

Well, upon my soul! Michael Roll and Ronald Pearson are giving a series of talks around Britain to prove survival after death. On Friday 12th May, the audience at 'The Star of the East' hall were privileged to hear a preview of the following day's lecture at Canterbury University.

Most readers already know that life continues when we 'die'. According to Michael Roll, the two main blocks to a general acceptance of life-after-death are:

• 1. The Scientific Establishment, who suppress any danger to their orthodox thinking.
• 2. The Churches, which won't allow anything which may destroy their religious doctrines.

A third block was recently over-come. Until last year, the Broadcasting Code of Great Britain stated that no-one may talk about survival after death in a serious manner - only in a light-hearted way. After a letter to the European Court, Lord Chalfont changed English law. So we may soon see, for the first time, serious life-after-death debates on television!

This will be a great opportunity to relay to the general public scientific proof of death survival. To be 'scientifically proven', two things are needed.

• 1. Repeatable experiments to show a thing exists.
• 2. Mathematics to prove a thing exists

The former has been possible since 1874! Experiments by Sir William Crookes, showed materialisation of 'dead' persons. These were published in the leading scientific journal of his day, 'The Quarterly Journal of Science'.

Soon, international teams of scientists had repeated the experiments which showed that people who had once lived on Earth could come back very much 'alive'. By the 1920's, Professor Charles Richet, the French Nobel Laureate for medical science, said about the experiments, 'There is ample proof that experimental materialisations should take definate rank as a scientific fact.'

Sir William Crookes and Sir Oliver Lodge, both pioneers of radio and television, put forward a rational explanation to account for the seemingly supernatural phenomena appearing at their experiments. They said that the etheric world is in the same place as radio and telvision signals, but at a much higher frequency. Unfortunately, there was no mathematics to prove the experiments (the other condition necessary for scientific acceptance).

This lack of mathematical proof soon worsened. Sir Isaac Newton's 'Theory of the Ether' had almost given an astronomical location for a parallel universe or next world that we can move into after 'death'. Now Einstein's materialistic 'Theory of Relativity' took over; he allowed no possibility for death survival. Since then, the scientific establishment has promoted 'Relativity'. Consequently they have had to exclude anything which may show life-after death because it didn't fit their theories!

Perhaps the establishment should have listened to Einstein properly. On his 70th birthday he said, 'Now you think that I am looking at my life's work with calm satisfaction. But there is not a single concept of which I am convinced that it will stand firm. I am not sure that I was on the right track after all.'

Even great academics today, like Professor Stephen Hawking of Cambridge University, admit that Einstein's relativity is incompatible with quantum mechanics. (Note: E=MC² is still OK.)

But at last we may have reached the turning point. Ronald Pearson BSc believes he has mathematically proved the existence of a normally unsensed universe. He has done this by rejecting relativity, and extending Newton's 'Theory of the Ether'. These extended mathematics back up the early experiments.

For scientifically knowledgable readers, part of this new extended equation is:

MC²= E = Eo v1-(v) ²/c Newton defined 'inerted mass' as M=F where F is accelerating force and a is acceleration produced. But M was assumed constant and did not change no matter how fast the object moved.

In Pearson's extended Newtonian, it is deduced by simple logic that, since energy is added to an object to make it go faster, the mass must increase. This yields E=MC₂ normally attributed to Einstein, but now deduced from Newton's laws.

This shows mathematically that the ether is compressible; and that it is densest closest to heavy objects - like planets. Newton's 'Theory of the Ether' is now mathematically acceptable.

The ether carries light waves and energy, and creates a mass of matter systems by making waves. When positives and negatives collide they may die; but more often than not they multiply like computer viruses. Then they join at T-junctions and form a matter-system like a neural network with its own built-in power supply. It is therefore capable of acting as a vast memory complex. It has all the ingredients needed for evolution to a conscious entity.

As the ether is provable by physics, this permits all paranormal and religious experiences - and materialisation. An intermediate frequency exists which can mix with our 'live' and 'dead' body forms. Materialisation - and therefore survival after death - is proven mathematically.

Certainly this theory has been 'accepted' in Russia where Pearson's extended Newtonian work has been published.

However, in England, the establishment is still trying to ban Pearson's theory. According to Michael Roll, this is because of the huge disruption to science, the establishment and the church which will result when these findings are accepted.

It is our grass-roots job to spread the word so that a change in accepted thinking can be allowed.

If you didn't understand this article, don't worry. I'm not sure that I do either! But help is available.

Michael Roll will send his new thesis, 'The Scientific Proof of Survival After Death', free-of-charge, to every reader who sends a stamped addressed envelope to 28, Westerleigh Road, Downend, Bristol, BS16 6AH.

But don't fret if you can't obtain a copy. You'll hear all about it in the next world..

Allan Sweeney

Articles Index | Home